Skip to content
Political Tracker

10 Mar 2026 · 7:35 PM · Division 16

Treasury Laws Amendment (Building a Stronger and Fairer Super System) Bill 2026, Superannuation (Building a Stronger and Fairer Super System) Imposition Bill 2026

Limitation of Debate
Official title
Bills — Treasury Laws Amendment (Building a Stronger and Fairer Super System) Bill 2026, Superannuation (Building a Stronger and Fairer Super System) Imposition Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
4
No
42
Not recorded voting
30

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

No plain-English summary has been written for this division yet. The official title above is the most reliable description of the question.

Text recorded with this division

Sue Lines

Pursuant to the order agreed to earlier today, the time allotted for debate on the bills has expired. I will now put the question before the chair and then put the questions on the remaining stages of the bills. I will begin with the second reading amendment circulated by One Nation.

One Nation's circulated amendment

At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate:

(a) notes that:

(i) Australians have been incentivised to accumulate large balances in superannuation because of extremely punitive income tax rates,

(ii) the Government's spending crisis has led them to raid Australians' retirement savings,

(iii) the debate on these bills has been guillotined and fast-tracked in a dirty deal between Labor and the Greens,

(iv) One Nation agrees with the low income super tax offset threshold being raised to help low income earners and One Nation's vote against these bills is not in opposition to this measure,

(v) superannuation belongs to Australians, it's their money and they should be able to direct it where they see fit,

(vi) One Nation policy calls on Australians to be able to invest their superannuation in a person's primary residence,

(vii) the Government is attempting to tax its way out of its own economic mismanagement instead of tackling spending blowouts and productivity,

(viii) superannuation was brought in to incentivise retirement and changes create uncertainty for long-term planning,

(ix) fees charged by union aligned superannuation funds that donate to Labor are exorbitant and decrease Australians' superannuation investments, and

(x) raising punitive taxes incentivises wealth leaving Australia; and

(b) calls on the Government to:

(i) implement comprehensive tax reform and reduce income tax paid by all Australians,

(ii) ensure any revenue raised from new taxes under these bills is directed to reducing income tax paid by Australians, and

(iii) get its spending under control, instead of raiding Australians' retirement savings".

Claire Chandler

I ask that the question be put separately on paragraphs (a)(iv) and (vi).

Sue Lines

We are beginning with the second reading amendment circulated by One Nation, but Senator Chandler has asked for the matter to be split. At this point, we are dealing with parts (a)(iv) and (a)(vi). The question is that parts (a)(iv) and (a)(vi) be agreed to.

This is the question as put in the chamber, with the name of the member who spoke before the vote. It isn't a summary of the bill or motion.

See this division on They Vote For You

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
4
No
42
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party023
Australian Greens08
Liberal Party06
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party40
Australia's Voice01
Deputy Senate President01
Independent01
Liberal National Party01
Senate President01

How each member voted

Aye · 4

No · 42

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.