Skip to content
Political Tracker

12 Mar 2026 · 1:03 PM · Division 16

Royal Commissions Legislation Amendment (Protections for Providing Information) Bill 2026

Third Reading - Pass the bill
Official title
Royal Commissions Legislation Amendment (Protections for Providing Information) Bill 2026 - Third Reading - Pass the bill

Third reading agreed to

Aye
34
No
10
Not recorded voting
32

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted in favour of a motion to read the bill for a third time. In other words, they voted in favour of passing the bill in the Senate. Because the bill has already passed in the House of Representatives, it can now become law.

What does this bill do?

According to the bills digest, which is a nonpartisan document prepared by the parliamentary library:

*The purpose of the Royal Commissions Legislation Amendment (Protections for Providing Information) Bill 2026 (the Bill) is to facilitate the provision of intelligence or operationally sensitive information to a Royal Commission.

The Bill will amend the Royal Commissions Act 1902 to:*

  • provide immunity from Commonwealth secrecy offences where a person provides intelligence or operationally sensitive information to a Royal Commission (as prescribed in the regulations) or their legal representative and
  • clarify that it is not a reasonable excuse to fail to provide intelligence or operationally sensitive information where required by a Royal Commission because it would contravene a secrecy provision.

The Bill will also amend the Criminal Code Act 1995 to make it a defence to an offence under Division 122 (which deals with secrecy of information) where a person communicates or deals with information for the primary purpose of providing it to a Royal Commission and the person has a reasonable belief that the relevant information was relevant to the Royal Commission’s inquiry.

The need to protect people engaging with Royal Commissions despite being subject to secrecy provisions has been raised previously, including by the Australian Law Reform Commission and by the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide.

The Attorney-General’s Department also considered the need for reform in its 2022 review of confidentiality protections in the Royal Commissions Act and its 2023 review of Commonwealth secrecy provisions.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
34
No
10
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party240
Australian Greens010
Liberal Party40
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party40
Australia's Voice10
Independent10

How each member voted

Aye · 34

No · 10

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.