Skip to content
Political Tracker

12 Mar 2026 · 3:24 PM · Division 18

Fuel Security

Let another motion be moved
Official title
Motions - Fuel Security - Let another motion be moved

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
28
No
34
Not recorded voting
14

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against a motion introduced by Victorian Senator Bridget McKenzie (Nationals), which means it was unsuccessful. Its purpose was to suspend the usual procedural rules - known as standing orders - in order to let another motion be moved.

Amendment text

That so much of the standing orders be suspended as would prevent me moving a motion to provide for the consideration of a matter, namely a motion to give precedence to a motion relating to the government's failure on fuel security.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
28
No
34
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party024
Liberal Party150
Australian Greens09
National Party30
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party30
Liberal National Party20
Australia's Voice10
Country Liberal Party10
Deputy Senate President10
Independent10
Senate President01
United Australia Party10

How each member voted

Aye · 28

No · 34

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.