Skip to content
Political Tracker

31 Mar 2026 · 1:19 PM · Division 4

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Integrity and Safeguarding) Bill 2025

Official title
National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Integrity and Safeguarding) Bill 2025 - in Committee - People who have been convicted of criminal offences

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
13
No
30
Not recorded voting
33

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against an amendment introduced by Victorian Senator Lidia Thorpe (Independent), which means it failed. The amendment would have removed the requirement for wholly agency‑managed participant plans for people who have been convicted of criminal offences.

Amendment text

(1) Schedule 2, page 38 (after line 15), at the end of the Schedule, add:

Part 4 — Plan management

National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013

13 Subsection 43(2AA)

Repeal the subsection.

14 Paragraph 43(3)(c)

Omit "or (aa)".

15 Paragraph 43(6)(d)

Omit "or (aa)".

16 Paragraph 43(7)(a)

Omit "(2AA),"

17 Paragraphs 44(1)(aa) and (2A)(aa)

Repeal the paragraphs.

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Getting the NDIS Back on Track No. 1) Act 2024

18 Paragraph 132(e) of Schedule 1

Omit "and".

19 Paragraphs 132(f) and (g) of Schedule 1

Repeal the paragraphs.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
13
No
30
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party124
Australian Greens100
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party04
Independent20
Liberal Party02

How each member voted

Aye · 13

No · 30

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.