Skip to content
Political Tracker

31 Mar 2026 · 9:09 PM · Division 19

Treasury Laws Amendment (Fuel Excise Relief) Bill 2026

Official title
Treasury Laws Amendment (Fuel Excise Relief) Bill 2026 - Second Reading - Reduction in fuel excise and heavy vehicle road user charge

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
22
No
36
Not recorded voting
18

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against part (a) of an amendment introduced by Tasmanian Senator Claire Chandler (Liberal), which means it was not successful. Had it been successful, the amendment would have added the text below to the usual second reading motion, which is "that the bill be read a second time" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill).

Amendment text

At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate notes that:

(a) the reduction in fuel excise and corresponding reduction in heavy vehicle road user charge reflects a policy first proposed by the Opposition;

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
22
No
36
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party024
Liberal Party170
Australian Greens08
National Party20
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party02
Deputy Senate President10
Independent01
Liberal National Party10
Senate President01
United Australia Party10

How each member voted

Aye · 22

No · 36

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.