Skip to content
Political Tracker

1 Apr 2026 · 11:03 AM · Division 12

National Health Amendment (Passive Immunological Products) Bill 2026

Limitation of Debate - Pass the bill
Official title
National Health Amendment (Passive Immunological Products) Bill 2026 - Limitation of Debate - Pass the bill

Ayes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
39
No
5
Not recorded voting
32

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding. 1 voted differently from most of their party.

What was decided

The majority voted in favour of a motion to agree with the remaining stages of the bill (parliamentary jargon for reading the bill a third time), meaning it will now be passed in the Senate. Since the bill has already passed in the House of Representatives, it now becomes law.

Rebellion

South Australian Senator Alex Antic (Liberal) crossed the floor to vote "No" against the rest of the Liberal Party.

What does this bill do?

According to the explanatory memorandum, which a document prepared by the Government (the party that introduced the bill):

The purpose of the National Health Amendment (Passive Immunological Products) Bill 2026 (the Bill) is to amend the definition of ‘vaccine’ in the National Health Act 1953 (the Act) to enable new and emerging technologies to be listed on the National Immunisation Program (the NIP).

The NIP provides free vaccines to eligible individuals in Australia to reduce the incidence and severity of vaccine-preventable diseases. It is an established collaborative program involving the Australian Government and state and territory governments.

The NIP relies on section 9B of the Act, which enables a vaccine to be specified as a ‘designated vaccine’ by legislative instrument. The legislative instrument can only specify vaccines if they are defined within the meaning of ‘vaccine’ under section 4 of the Act. There is no scope to designate another product that is not a vaccine as defined in the Act.

The current definition of ‘vaccine’ in the Act supports the technical meaning of ‘vaccine’ being a substance administered to elicit an immune response – that is a mode of active immunisation. Immunisation products that do not elicit an immune response and provide protection through passive immunological means are unable to be listed on the NIP.

The Bill will broaden the definition of ‘vaccine’ in the Act to enable new and emerging technologies to be listed on the NIP. This amendment will expand access to these necessary products, ensuring the NIP is flexible and fit-for-purpose in a rapidly evolving healthcare environment.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
39
No
5
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party250
Australian Greens100
Liberal Party21
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party03
Independent10
Senate President10
United Australia Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 39

No · 5

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.