Skip to content
Political Tracker

1 Apr 2026 · 11:45 AM · Division 22

Translating and Interpreting Services Bill 2025

Official title
Translating and Interpreting Services Bill 2025 - Limitation of Debate - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander languages

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
12
No
31
Not recorded voting
33

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against an amendment to the usual second reading motion, which is "that the bill be a read a second time" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). Had it been successful, it would have added the words below to the usual motion.

Motion text

At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate notes that the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander translating and interpreting services industry must be independently recognised and strengthened as well as led, developed and delivered by First Nations Aboriginal Community Controlled Organisations and practitioners, as enshrined in the upcoming new National Framework for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Interpreting and Translating".

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
12
No
31
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party122
Australian Greens100
Liberal Party04
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party03
Independent10
Senate President01
United Australia Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 12

No · 31

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.