Skip to content
Political Tracker

28 May 2026 · 9:19 AM · Division 3

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the Ndis for Future Generations) Bill 2026

Second Reading - CALD communities
Official title
National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the Ndis for Future Generations) Bill 2026 - Second Reading - CALD communities

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
12
No
86
Not recorded voting
52

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against an amendment introduced by Fowler MP Dai Le (Independent), which means it failed. This amendment would have changed the words of the usual second reading motion, which is "that the bill be read a second time" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill).

Amendment text

That all words after “House” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:

“(1) notes that:

(a) culturally and linguistically diverse communities experience additional barriers in accessing and engaging with the NDIS; and

(b) a lack of consultation with culturally and linguistically diverse participants and service providers may result in further barriers and inequity; and

(2) calls on the Government to ensure the implementation of the reforms does not inadvertently impose additional burdens on, or further disadvantage culturally and linguistically diverse NDIS participants”.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
12
No
86
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party086
Independent100
Australian Greens10
Centre Alliance10

How each member voted

Aye · 12

No · 86

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.