Skip to content
Political Tracker

24 June 2026 · 6:04 PM · Division 7

Matters of Urgency

National Disability Insurance Scheme - Criticism of AUKUS
Official title
Matters of Urgency - National Disability Insurance Scheme - Criticism of AUKUS

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
10
No
31
Not recorded voting
35

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against a motion moved at the request of Tasmanian Senator Nick McKim (Greens), which means it was unsuccessful.

Motion text

That, in the opinion of the Senate, the following is a matter of urgency:

The need for the government to invest in the services and supports disabled people need instead of handing over hundreds of billions of dollars to Trump for AUKUS, at a time when disabled people are fighting for the NDIS supports they need and families are facing increasing cost of living pressures.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
10
No
31
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party023
Australian Greens100
Liberal Party06
National Party01
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 10

No · 31

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.