Skip to content
Political Tracker

25 June 2026 · 10:19 AM · Division 2

Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026, Income Tax Rates Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026

Limitation of DebateAmendment

A vote on changing the text of a bill or motion, not on passing it.

Official title
Bills — Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026, Income Tax Rates Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate

Opposition amendments defeated

Aye
24
No
32
Not recorded voting
20

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

No plain-English summary has been written for this division yet. The result above is read from the question recorded in the chamber, shown below.

Text recorded with this division

Sue Lines

I will now deal with the remaining second reading amendments circulated by the opposition. The question is that the amendments on sheet 3884, 3887 and 3892 be agreed to.

Opposition's circulated amendments—

SHEET 3884

Omit all words after "That", substitute "the Senate

(a) notes that:

(i) the Government is reducing housing supply in the midst of a housing crisis,

(ii) the Government's higher taxes mean 35,000 fewer homes, higher rents and less housing investment,

(iii) the Government's higher taxes add to the cost of housing, with existing taxes, fees and charges already adding up to 50 per cent to the cost of a new home, and

(iv) the Government is already more than 100,000 dwellings behind its own 1.2 million housing target and is projected to miss the target by well over 200,000 dwellings; and

(b) calls on the Government to introduce legislation to ban APRA-regulated super fund investment in residential property".

_____

SHEET 3887

Omit all words after "That", substitute "the Senate notes that:

(a) the Economics Legislation Committee inquiry into this bill was a rushed sham;

(b) the inquiry did not have enough time to enable the committee to consider hundreds of submissions;

(c) Treasury officials refused to provide evidence, refused to undertake basic preparations for their appearance and refused to table answers to questions on notice within a reasonable timeframe; and

(d) the Treasurer announced amendments one day after the committee concluded its hearing, making a mockery of transparency, scrutiny and proper parliamentary process".

_____

SHEET 3892

Omit all words after "That", substitute "the Senate notes that:

(a) the Government's higher taxes will starve junior minerals explorers of capital;

(b) 75% of Australia's economic mineral discoveries are made by small and mid-tier explorers who rely on investors willing to back high-risk projects;

(c) discovery to production can take 15 years and therefore Australians will pay the price for decades to come of exploration drying up; and

(d) the Government has already hit the resources sector by cutting the highly successful Junior Minerals Exploration Incentive".

This is the question as put in the chamber, with the name of the member who spoke before the vote. It isn't a summary of the bill or motion.

See this division on They Vote For You

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
24
No
32
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party022
Liberal Party140
Australian Greens09
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party40
National Party20
Country Liberal Party10
Deputy Senate President10
Independent01
Liberal National Party10
United Australia Party10

How each member voted

Aye · 24

No · 32

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.