Skip to content
Political Tracker

19 Aug 2026 · 5:27 PM · Division 8

Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026, National Self-Exclusion Register (Cost Recovery Levy) Amendment Bill 2026, Interactive Gambling (Cost Recovery Levy) Bill 2026

Limitation of Debate
Official title
Bills — Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026, National Self-Exclusion Register (Cost Recovery Levy) Amendment Bill 2026, Interactive Gambling (Cost Recovery Levy) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate

Second reading agreed to

Aye
29
No
13
Not recorded voting
34

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

No plain-English summary has been written for this division yet. The result above is read from the question recorded in the chamber, shown below.

Text recorded with this division

Sue Lines

I will now deal with the second reading amendment circulated by Senator Thorpe.

Senator Thorpe's circulated amendment—

Omit all words after "That", substitute "the Senate rejects the bill and is of the opinion that:

(a) gambling disproportionately harms Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people;

(b) the bill was subject to inadequate consultation with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people impacted by gambling harms; and

(c) the bill ignores many of the recommendations in the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs report 'You win some, you lose more' (known as the Murphy report), including:

(i) that the Australian Government should establish a national online gambling regulator with the sole purpose of reducing harm and with responsibility for all licencing and regulation, and

(ii) that this regulator should levy online wagering service providers to fund national strategy harm reduction measures, including supporting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community-controlled health organisations to develop and implement measures that reduce gambling harm impacting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people".

The question is that the amendment on sheet 3973 be agreed to.

Question negatived.

Nick McKim

I ask that the Australian Greens' support for Senator Thorpe's second reading amendment be noted.

Sue Lines

The question now is that the bills be now read a second time.

This is the question as put in the chamber, with the name of the member who spoke before the vote. It isn't a summary of the bill or motion.

See this division on They Vote For You

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
29
No
13
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party200
Australian Greens09
Liberal Party22
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party40
Deputy Senate President10
Independent01
Jacqui Lambie Network01
National Party10
Senate President10

How each member voted

Aye · 29

No · 13

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.