Skip to content
Political Tracker

14 Sept 2026 · 4:25 PM · Division 9

Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee

Reference
Official title
Committees — Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee; Reference

Ayes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
35
No
19
Not recorded voting
22

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

No plain-English summary has been written for this division yet. The official title above is the most reliable description of the question.

Text recorded with this division

Steph Hodgins-May

I seek leave to amend business of the Senate notice of motion No. 4.

Leave granted.

I move the motion as amended:

That the following matter be referred to the Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee for inquiry and report by 18 November 2026:

The administration of the Major and Local Community Infrastructure Program including:

(a) program design, guidelines, funding criteria and eligibility requirements;

(b) the processes for identifying, inviting, assessing and selecting applicants;

(c) the role of the offices of the Prime Minister and other relevant ministers or members of Parliament in determining which organisations were invited to apply, which grants were awarded and who would announce successful grants;

(d) the role of the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet and the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts in identifying and recommending which organisations were invited to apply;

(e) the geographic and electoral distribution of grants;

(f) any actual, potential or perceived conflicts of interest involving ministers, members of Parliament and applicants or grant recipients, or breaches of the Code of Conduct for Ministers; and

(g) any other related matters.

Katy Gallagher

I seek leave to make a short statement.

Slade Brockman

Leave is granted for one minute.

Katy Gallagher

The government was happy to support this motion with two amendments. One was to remove the part on breaches of the code of conduct for ministers, because it's not up to committees to determine whether a code of conduct has been breached, and the other was to have inserted into the motion advice from previous Auditor-General's reports which specifically goes to the issue of how to handle the delivery of election commitments. We had agreement with the Greens around that amendment until, unfortunately, Senator Hodgins-May determined that she would rather reach agreement with the Liberals on this and refused to withdraw the code-of-conduct part. So I just want to make it clear that the government was keen to support this motion until we were unable to get those minor amendments—minor but important amendments—to this committee referral.

Slade Brockman

The question is that business of the Senate motion No. 4 moved by Senator Hodgins-May, as amended, be agreed to.

This is the question as put in the chamber, with the name of the member who spoke before the vote. It isn't a summary of the bill or motion.

See this division on They Vote For You

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
35
No
19
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party019
Liberal Party130
Australian Greens90
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party40
National Party30
Australia's Voice10
Country Liberal Party10
Independent10
Jacqui Lambie Network10
Liberal National Party10
United Australia Party10

How each member voted

Aye · 35

No · 19

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.