Skip to content
Political Tracker

16 Sept 2026 · 4:07 PM · Division 3

Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee

Reference
Official title
Committees — Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee; Reference

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
27
No
31
Not recorded voting
18

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

No plain-English summary has been written for this division yet. The official title above is the most reliable description of the question.

Text recorded with this division

Maria Kovacic

At the request of Senator McDonald, I move:

That the following matters be referred to the Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee for inquiry and report by 31 March 2027:

(a) the design, objectives and administration of the Fuel and Fertiliser Security Facility;

(b) the eligibility criteria and assessment processes used to determine which fertiliser companies, suppliers and importers receive government support;

(c) the nature, value and commercial terms of government guarantees, underwriting and other financial assistance provided under the facility;

(d) the financial risks and potential liabilities to Australian taxpayers, including the adequacy of risk management and safeguards;

(e) the impact of the facility on competition and market conditions in the Australian fertiliser industry, including whether government support has advantaged particular market participants or disadvantaged non-participating suppliers and importers;

(f) the impact of the facility on fertiliser prices, supply and availability for Australian farmers, including whether the benefits of government support are being passed through to producers;

(g) the transparency and accountability of the facility, including the disclosure of participating entities, the basis on which support was provided, government financial exposure and the outcomes achieved;

(h) the effectiveness of the facility in strengthening Australia's long-term fertiliser security and supply chain resilience, including whether the design of the facility has created unintended market or competition consequences, and whether alternative policy approaches could achieve these objectives more effectively or at lower cost; and

(i) any other related matters.

Sue Lines

The question is business of the Senate notice of motion No. 2, standing in the name of Senator McDonald, be agreed to.

This is the question as put in the chamber, with the name of the member who spoke before the vote. It isn't a summary of the bill or motion.

See this division on They Vote For You

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
27
No
31
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party020
Liberal Party130
Australian Greens010
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party40
Independent20
Liberal National Party20
National Party20
Australia's Voice10
Country Liberal Party10
Jacqui Lambie Network10
Senate President01
United Australia Party10

How each member voted

Aye · 27

No · 31

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.