Skip to content
Political Tracker

17 Sept 2026 · 1:10 PM · Division 7

Defence Force Discipline Amendment (Rcdvs Implementation and Related Measures No. 1) Bill 2026

in Committee
Official title
Bills — Defence Force Discipline Amendment (Rcdvs Implementation and Related Measures No. 1) Bill 2026; in Committee

Ayes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
30
No
24
Not recorded voting
22

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

No plain-English summary has been written for this division yet. The official title above is the most reliable description of the question.

Text recorded with this division

Dean Smith

I move opposition amendment (1) on sheet 3937:

(1) Schedule 5, item 65, page 173 (line 17) to page 175 (line 2), to be opposed.

Jenny McAllister

The government will be opposing this amendment. The amendment would limit the appointment of investigating officers under the act to Defence members, except for cases of relevant sexual misconduct, which could be undertaken by any person appointed under the act. The consequence of this would be to limit our ability to appoint non-Defence individuals as investigating officers—for example, an officer of the Australian Federal Police—and this would significantly impact all types of investigations, including sexual violence investigations.

Maria Kovacic

I wish to seek clarification. We understood we were dealing with amendment sheet No. 3937. That doesn't appear to be sheet No. 3937.

Jenny McAllister

Thank you very much for the clarification, Senator Kovacic. My apologies; however, we do also oppose this amendment. This amendment would remove a proposed section of the act which creates powers for directions and guidelines to be issued by the minister to the Director of Military Prosecutions related to the performance of their roles and functions. The consequence of this would be to remove the ability for any ministerial oversight of the roles and functions of the Director of Military Prosecutions.

Dave Sharma

The question is that item 65 of schedule 5 stand as printed.

This is the question as put in the chamber, with the name of the member who spoke before the vote. It isn't a summary of the bill or motion.

See this division on They Vote For You

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
30
No
24
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party200
Liberal Party013
Australian Greens100
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party04
Australia's Voice01
Country Liberal Party01
Independent01
Jacqui Lambie Network01
Liberal National Party01
National Party01
United Australia Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 30

No · 24

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.