Skip to content
Political Tracker

15 May 2013 · 1:36 PM · Division 2

Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Legislation Amendment Bill 2012

Consideration in Detail - Remove re-registration process
Official title
Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Legislation Amendment Bill 2012 - Consideration in Detail - Remove re-registration process

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
69
No
70
Not recorded voting
11

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against amendments introduced by Nationals MP John Cobb, which means that they were rejected.

In his explanation of the amendments, Mr Cobb said that the Coalition "is strongly of the view that the only way to achieve the stated aim of the bill to increase efficiency and speed up the review of high-risk chemistries is to remove the reregistration process."(Read Mr Cobb's full explanation of his amendments here. )

Background to the bill

The bill was introduced to implement one of the Government's 2010 election promises. This promise was made in response to recommendations of the Australian National Audit Office and the Productivity Commission.(Read more about the background to the bill in its bills digest. )

It amends the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code (the Agvet Code) which is a Schedule to the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code Act 1994 to:

  • through a risk-based approach, improve: the consistency and transparency of the process for making, and assessing, applications for approval of an active constituent for a proposed, or existing, chemical product; and the registration of a chemical product and approval of a label for the containers of a chemical product
  • insert a new requirement that existing approvals and registrations operate for a finite period and, when that period has elapsed, a new application must be lodged for re-approval or re-registration and
  • update existing offences, create new offences and insert civil penalty provisions.(Read more about the background to the bill in its bills digest.

)

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
69
No
70
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party066
Liberal Party550
National Party120
Independent03
Australian Greens01
Country Liberal Party10
Katter's Australian Party10

How each member voted

Aye · 69

No · 70

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.