Skip to content
Political Tracker

11 Oct 2012 · 12:15 PM · Division 3

Data Retention Advice

Order for the Production of Documents
Official title
Documents — Data Retention Advice; Order for the Production of Documents

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
10
No
34
Not recorded voting
32

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

Senator Scott Ludlam moved:

That there be laid on the table by the Minister representing the Attorney-General, no later than noon on Monday, 29 October 2012, advice provided to the Attorney-General by the Attorney-General's Department or other government departments on data retention, including, but not limited to:

(a) legal advice regarding data retention in Australia;

(b) legal advice regarding data retention regimes in other jurisdictions;

(c) technical and political advice arising from meetings with experts and industry representatives;

(d) costings and methodology for reaching estimates of costings;

(e) internal departmental correspondence; and

(f) interdepartmental communications – emails and documents pertaining to data retention.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
10
No
34
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party019
Liberal Party012
Australian Greens90
National Party02
Deputy Senate President01
Democratic Labor Party10

How each member voted

Aye · 10

No · 34

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.