Skip to content
Political Tracker

11 Oct 2012 · 12:20 PM · Division 4

National Data Retention Scheme

Order for the Production of Documents
Official title
Documents — National Data Retention Scheme; Order for the Production of Documents

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
10
No
31
Not recorded voting
35

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

Senator Scott Ludlam moved:

That there be laid on the table by the Minister representing the Attorney-General, no later than noon on Monday, 29 October 2012, the following:

(a) a list of dates, invitees and attendees of meetings held between the Attorney-General's Department and ISPs, consumer and content industry groups regarding a national data retention scheme;

(b) briefing notes and advice generated by the Attorney-General's Department in advance of the meetings;

(c) interdepartmental communications – emails and documents pertaining to the meetings; and

(d) minutes and reports of these meetings.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
10
No
31
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party017
Liberal Party012
Australian Greens90
Deputy Senate President01
Democratic Labor Party10
National Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 10

No · 31

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.