Skip to content
Political Tracker

26 Mar 2007 · 3:49 PM · Division 3

Murray-Darling Basin

Purchase water licences
Official title
Motions - Murray-Darling Basin - Purchase water licences

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
31
No
33
Not recorded voting
12

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against a motion introduced by Greens Senator Rachel Siewert. This means that the motion was rejected.

The motion was:

That the Senate:

(a) notes:

_(i) the listing of the Murray-Darling Basin in the WWF study ‘World’s top 10 rivers at risk’,_(The WWF study is available for download here. )

_(ii) that threats such as invasive species, over-allocation and climate change are the reasons the river system has been listed as ‘at risk’, and_

(iii) the report’s recommendations that returning significantly greater environmental flows to the river will have major benefits in reducing the prevalence of some invasive species and improving river health; and

(b) calls on the Government to begin purchasing water licences without further delay in order to return environmental flows to the Murray-Darling river system.(Read more about water security in Australia on Wikipedia.)

References

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
32
No
34
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Liberal Party026
Australian Labor Party220
Australian Democrats40
Australian Greens40
National Party04
Senate President11
Country Liberal Party01
Deputy Senate President01
Family First Party10
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 32

No · 34

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.