Skip to content
Political Tracker

20 Sept 2007 · 7:53 PM · Division 3

Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Bill 2007 — In Committee — Require judicial warrants

Official title
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Bill 2007 — In Committee — Require judicial warrants

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
6
No
50
Not recorded voting
20

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority disagreed that law enforcement agencies should have to get a judicial warrant before accessing telecommunications data about a communication (rather than its actual content). This data includes data on who is sending and receiving a particular communication, the date and time it was sent and how long a communication lasted.

This requirement for a warrant was proposed by Senator Natasha Stott Despoja (see her explanation of this amendment).

Background to the bill

The bill introduces a second group of recommendations made by the Review of the Regulation of Access to Communications (known as the Blunn Report). In particular, the bill transfers key security and law enforcement provisions from the Telecommunications Act 1997 to the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979.

These provisions relate to access to telecommunications data, which is information about a communication rather than its content and includes data on the sending and receiving parties, and the date, time and duration of the communication. The bill also proposes a new two-tier access regime for access to historic and ‘prospective’ telecommunications data (read more about the bill in its bills digest.)

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
7
No
51
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Liberal Party022
Australian Labor Party020
Australian Democrats40
National Party04
Australian Greens30
Country Liberal Party01
Deputy Senate President01
Family First Party01
Senate President01
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 7

No · 51

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.