20 Sept 2007 · 7:53 PM · Division 3
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Bill 2007 — In Committee — Require judicial warrants
- Official title
- Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Bill 2007 — In Committee — Require judicial warrants
Noes in the majority
This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.
- Aye
- 6
- No
- 50
- Not recorded voting
- 20
“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.
What was decided
The majority disagreed that law enforcement agencies should have to get a judicial warrant before accessing telecommunications data about a communication (rather than its actual content). This data includes data on who is sending and receiving a particular communication, the date and time it was sent and how long a communication lasted.
This requirement for a warrant was proposed by Senator Natasha Stott Despoja (see her explanation of this amendment).
Background to the bill
The bill introduces a second group of recommendations made by the Review of the Regulation of Access to Communications (known as the Blunn Report). In particular, the bill transfers key security and law enforcement provisions from the Telecommunications Act 1997 to the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979.
These provisions relate to access to telecommunications data, which is information about a communication rather than its content and includes data on the sending and receiving parties, and the date, time and duration of the communication. The bill also proposes a new two-tier access regime for access to historic and ‘prospective’ telecommunications data (read more about the bill in its bills digest.)
Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate
Policies this vote counts towards
- Increasing surveillance powersSupporters vote No
- Requiring a warrant to access citizens’ telecommunications recordsSupporters vote Aye · counts strongly
Votes by party
Votes by party as a table
| Party | Aye | No |
|---|---|---|
| Liberal Party | 0 | 22 |
| Australian Labor Party | 0 | 20 |
| Australian Democrats | 4 | 0 |
| National Party | 0 | 4 |
| Australian Greens | 3 | 0 |
| Country Liberal Party | 0 | 1 |
| Deputy Senate President | 0 | 1 |
| Family First Party | 0 | 1 |
| Senate President | 0 | 1 |
| Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party | 0 | 1 |
How each member voted
Aye · 7
- Lyn AllisonVictoria · Democrats
- Andrew BartlettQueensland · Democrats
- Andrew MurrayWA · Democrats
- Natasha Stott DespojaSA · Democrats
- Christine MilneTasmania · Greens
- Kerry NettleNSW · Greens
- Rachel SiewertWA · Greens
No · 51
- Mark BishopWA · Labor
- Carol BrownTasmania · Labor
- George CampbellNSW · Labor
- Kim CarrVictoria · Labor
- Trish CrossinNT · Labor
- Chris EvansWA · Labor
- John FaulknerNSW · Labor
- Annette HurleySA · Labor
- Linda KirkSA · Labor
- Joe LudwigQueensland · Labor
- Gavin MarshallVictoria · Labor
- Anne McEwenSA · Labor
- Jan McLucasQueensland · Labor
- Claire MooreQueensland · Labor
- Helen PolleyTasmania · Labor
- Robert RayVictoria · Labor
- Glenn SterleWA · Labor
- Ruth WebberWA · Labor
- Penny WongSA · Labor
- Dana WortleySA · Labor
- Nigel ScullionNT · CLP
- Stephen ParryTasmania · Deputy Senate President
- Steve FieldingVictoria · Family First
- Judith AdamsWA · Liberal
- Guy BarnettTasmania · Liberal
- Cory BernardiSA · Liberal
- Simon BirminghamSA · Liberal
- Sue BoyceQueensland · Liberal
- David BushbyTasmania · Liberal
- Grant ChapmanSA · Liberal
Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.