13 Aug 2009 · 11:49 AM · Division 5
Freedom of Information (Removal of Conclusive Certificates and Other Measures) Bill 2008 [2009] — In Committee — Remove deeming provisions exempting agencies
- Official title
- Freedom of Information (Removal of Conclusive Certificates and Other Measures) Bill 2008 [2009] — In Committee — Remove deeming provisions exempting agencies
Noes in the majority
This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.
- Aye
- 5
- No
- 40
- Not recorded voting
- 31
“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.
What was decided
The majority voted against the amendments introduced by Greens Senator Scott Ludlam, which means they were unsuccessful. The amendments would have inserted provisions to repeal subsection 7(1) and Division 1 of Part I of Schedule 2 of the Freedom of Information Act 1982, which dealt with the exemption of certain persons and bodies from the provisions of that Act.
Background to the bill
The bill was introduced to:
- remove the power to issue conclusive certificates;
- revoke existing conclusive certificates if a new access request is received;
- implement measures to protect sensitive information in proceedings before the Administrative Appeals Tribunal; and
- make consequential amendments.(More information about the bill, including its explanatory memorandum, is available here
)
The abolition of conclusive certificates was part of the Labor Party's 2007 election policy commitment.(Read more about this policy commitment in the bills digest. ) This would have addressed the current situation where a Minister can issue a certificate that exempts a document from the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 if the Minister is satisfied that an exemption applies (e.g. in relation to national security).(Read more about conclusive certificates in the bills digest.)
Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate
Policies this vote counts towards
- Increasing access under Freedom of Information lawSupporters vote Aye
Votes by party
Votes by party as a table
| Party | Aye | No |
|---|---|---|
| Australian Labor Party | 0 | 20 |
| Liberal Party | 0 | 17 |
| Australian Greens | 5 | 0 |
| National Party | 0 | 2 |
| Deputy Senate President | 0 | 1 |
| Family First Party | 0 | 1 |
| Independent | 1 | 0 |
How each member voted
Aye · 6
- Bob BrownTasmania · Greens
- Sarah Hanson-YoungSA · Greens
- Scott LudlamWA · Greens
- Christine MilneTasmania · Greens
- Rachel SiewertWA · Greens
- Nick XenophonSA · Independent
No · 41
- Catryna BilykTasmania · Labor
- Mark BishopWA · Labor
- Carol BrownTasmania · Labor
- Doug CameronNSW · Labor
- Kim CarrVictoria · Labor
- Jacinta CollinsVictoria · Labor
- Trish CrossinNT · Labor
- Don FarrellSA · Labor
- David FeeneyVictoria · Labor
- Mark FurnerQueensland · Labor
- Annette HurleySA · Labor
- Joe LudwigQueensland · Labor
- Kate LundyACT · Labor
- Anne McEwenSA · Labor
- Jan McLucasQueensland · Labor
- Helen PolleyTasmania · Labor
- Louise PrattWA · Labor
- Ursula StephensNSW · Labor
- Glenn SterleWA · Labor
- Dana WortleySA · Labor
- Stephen ParryTasmania · Deputy Senate President
- Steve FieldingVictoria · Family First
- Judith AdamsWA · Liberal
- Christopher BackWA · Liberal
- Guy BarnettTasmania · Liberal
- Cory BernardiSA · Liberal
- Simon BirminghamSA · Liberal
- Sue BoyceQueensland · Liberal
- George BrandisQueensland · Liberal
- David BushbyTasmania · Liberal
Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.