Skip to content
Political Tracker

27 Oct 2009 · 3:45 PM · Division 2

Parallel Import Restrictions on Books

Territorial copyright protection
Official title
Motions - Parallel Import Restrictions on Books - Territorial copyright protection

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
5
No
38
Not recorded voting
33

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against the motion introduced by Greens Senator Christine Milne and Greens Senator Scott Ludlam.

Wording of the motion

That the Senate—

(a) notes that:

(i) the experience from around the world does not support claims from the Productivity Commission and others that removing territorial copyright protection would reduce the market price for books, and

(ii) there is ample evidence that removing territorial copyright protection would hurt Australia’s writers, publishers and printers, damaging both Australia’s culture and economy; and

(b) calls on the Government to abandon the plans, inherited from the Howard Government, to remove or restrict territorial copyright protection for books.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
6
No
39
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party019
Liberal Party015
Australian Greens50
National Party03
Deputy Senate President01
Family First Party01
Independent10

How each member voted

Aye · 6

No · 39

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.