Skip to content
Political Tracker

22 June 2010 · 4:00 PM · Division 2

Transition to Renewable Energy

Undertake a study
Official title
Motions - Transition to Renewable Energy - Undertake a study

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
5
No
42
Not recorded voting
29

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against a motion introduced by Greens Senator Christine Milne. This means that it was rejected. The motion was:

That the Senate-

_(a) notes that the Zero Carbon Australia Stationary Energy Plan Zero Carbon Australia Stationary Energy Plan released by Beyond Zero Emissions and the University of Melbourne shows:_

(i) that it is technically possible for Australia to achieve 100 per cent renewable energy within a decade, and

(ii) that the technologies to achieve this goal, including baseload solar thermal energy with storage, are commercially available today;(Read more about thermal energy storage here.)

(b) applauds the organisations involved for their vision and efforts; and

(c) calls on the Australian Government to direct the Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism and the Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency to undertake a similar study to examine the potential for a swift transition to 100 per cent renewable energy in Australia.

References

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
6
No
43
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party023
Liberal Party016
Australian Greens50
National Party02
Deputy Senate President01
Family First Party01
Independent10

How each member voted

Aye · 6

No · 43

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.