22 June 2010 · 4:06 PM · Division 3
Mandatory Vehicle Fuel Efficiency Standards
- Official title
- Motions - Mandatory Vehicle Fuel Efficiency Standards - Introduce
Noes in the majority
This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.
- Aye
- 5
- No
- 41
- Not recorded voting
- 30
“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.
What was decided
The majority voted against a motion introduced by Tasmanian Senator Christine Milne (Greens), which means it failed.
Motion text
That the Senate—
(a) notes that:
(i) road transport amounts to 12 per cent of Australia’s total carbon dioxide emissions, and the largest source of these emissions was passenger cars,
(ii) more efficient cars would improve Australia’s energy security,
(iii) internationally, a number of states have adopted mandatory standards for vehicle fuel efficiency, for example Europe is in the process of legislating for a target of 130g CO2 per km by 2015,
(iv) the automotive industry accepted a voluntary target of 222g CO2 per kilometre by 2010 and that this target was met ahead of schedule, arguably with ‘business as usual’ improvements,
(v) the 2010-11 Budget cut $200 million from the Green Car Innovation Fund, which provides grants to automobile industries to encourage investment in efficient technology, a cut that was justified on the basis that demand for grants was lower than anticipated, and
(iv) in July 2009, the Council of Australian Governments requested that the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government produce a regulatory impact statement into a mandatory scheme for vehicle fuel efficiency and that this report was originally to be made public for consultation before the end of March 2010, but has still not been released; and
(b) calls on the Government to release the regulatory impact statement into a mandatory scheme for vehicle fuel efficiency and move to introduce mandatory fuel efficiency standards without further delay.
Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate
Policies this vote counts towards
- A lower-carbon and less environmentally-damaging transportation system in AustraliaSupporters vote Aye · counts strongly
- Vehicle efficiency standardsSupporters vote Aye
Votes by party
Votes by party as a table
| Party | Aye | No |
|---|---|---|
| Australian Labor Party | 0 | 23 |
| Liberal Party | 0 | 15 |
| Australian Greens | 5 | 0 |
| National Party | 0 | 2 |
| Deputy Senate President | 0 | 1 |
| Family First Party | 0 | 1 |
| Independent | 1 | 0 |
How each member voted
Aye · 6
- Bob BrownTasmania · Greens
- Sarah Hanson-YoungSA · Greens
- Scott LudlamWA · Greens
- Christine MilneTasmania · Greens
- Rachel SiewertWA · Greens
- Nick XenophonSA · Independent
No · 42
- Catryna BilykTasmania · Labor
- Mark BishopWA · Labor
- Carol BrownTasmania · Labor
- Doug CameronNSW · Labor
- Jacinta CollinsVictoria · Labor
- Trish CrossinNT · Labor
- Don FarrellSA · Labor
- David FeeneyVictoria · Labor
- Michael ForshawNSW · Labor
- Mark FurnerQueensland · Labor
- Annette HurleySA · Labor
- Steve HutchinsNSW · Labor
- Joe LudwigQueensland · Labor
- Kate LundyACT · Labor
- Gavin MarshallVictoria · Labor
- Anne McEwenSA · Labor
- Jan McLucasQueensland · Labor
- Claire MooreQueensland · Labor
- Kerry O'BrienTasmania · Labor
- Helen PolleyTasmania · Labor
- Louise PrattWA · Labor
- Glenn SterleWA · Labor
- Dana WortleySA · Labor
- Stephen ParryTasmania · Deputy Senate President
- Steve FieldingVictoria · Family First
- Judith AdamsWA · Liberal
- Christopher BackWA · Liberal
- Guy BarnettTasmania · Liberal
- Cory BernardiSA · Liberal
- Sue BoyceQueensland · Liberal
Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.