Skip to content
Political Tracker

22 June 2010 · 4:06 PM · Division 3

Mandatory Vehicle Fuel Efficiency Standards

Introduce
Official title
Motions - Mandatory Vehicle Fuel Efficiency Standards - Introduce

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
5
No
41
Not recorded voting
30

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against a motion introduced by Tasmanian Senator Christine Milne (Greens), which means it failed.

Motion text

That the Senate—

(a) notes that:

(i) road transport amounts to 12 per cent of Australia’s total carbon dioxide emissions, and the largest source of these emissions was passenger cars,

(ii) more efficient cars would improve Australia’s energy security,

(iii) internationally, a number of states have adopted mandatory standards for vehicle fuel efficiency, for example Europe is in the process of legislating for a target of 130g CO2 per km by 2015,

(iv) the automotive industry accepted a voluntary target of 222g CO2 per kilometre by 2010 and that this target was met ahead of schedule, arguably with ‘business as usual’ improvements,

(v) the 2010-11 Budget cut $200 million from the Green Car Innovation Fund, which provides grants to automobile industries to encourage investment in efficient technology, a cut that was justified on the basis that demand for grants was lower than anticipated, and

(iv) in July 2009, the Council of Australian Governments requested that the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government produce a regulatory impact statement into a mandatory scheme for vehicle fuel efficiency and that this report was originally to be made public for consultation before the end of March 2010, but has still not been released; and

(b) calls on the Government to release the regulatory impact statement into a mandatory scheme for vehicle fuel efficiency and move to introduce mandatory fuel efficiency standards without further delay.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
6
No
42
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party023
Liberal Party015
Australian Greens50
National Party02
Deputy Senate President01
Family First Party01
Independent10

How each member voted

Aye · 6

No · 42

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.