Skip to content
Political Tracker

19 Mar 2013 · 3:47 PM · Division 2

Public Interest Disclosure

Protect whistle blowers
Official title
Motions - Public Interest Disclosure - Protect whistle blowers

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
11
No
37
Not recorded voting
28

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against a motion introduced by Greens Senator Scott Ludlam in relation to protection for whistle blowers.

Motion text

That the Senate—

(a) notes:

(i) the resolution of the Senate of 22 November 2012, That the Government was to fulfil its 2007 election commitment and introduce a public interest disclosure bill into the Parliament in the first sitting week of 2013, and

(ii) that this resolution has not been complied with and, to date, there is still no listing of the public interest disclosure bill; and

(b) calls on the Government to:

(i) provide an explanation as to whether it will deliver on its 2007 election commitment, and

(ii) introduce legislation within the current Parliament that would comprehensively protect whistle-blowers across the entire government sector.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
11
No
37
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party024
Liberal Party010
Australian Greens90
National Party02
Deputy Senate President01
Democratic Labor Party10
Independent10

How each member voted

Aye · 11

No · 37

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.