2 Mar 2011 · 12:30 PM · Division 1
Telecommunications Interception and Intelligence Services Legislation Amendment Bill 2010 — In Committee
- Official title
- Telecommunications Interception and Intelligence Services Legislation Amendment Bill 2010 — In Committee - ASIO's annual report (access to information)
Noes in the majority
This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.
- Aye
- 4
- No
- 32
- Not recorded voting
- 40
“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.
What was decided
The majority voted against an amendment introduced by Greens Senator Scott Ludlam, which means that it was rejected.
This amendment would have required certain additional information to be reported in the annual report of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation ('ASIO'). This information would have included:
- the total number of requests made during the year for co-operation and assistance;
- the name of each body which made a request; and
- a summary of the purpose or purposes for which each request was made.(Read the exact wording of Senator Ludlam's amendment here.
)
Background to the bill
The bill was introduced "to facilitate increased cooperation, assistance and information sharing in areas of key national security by the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), the Australian Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS), the Defence Signals Directorate (DSD) and the Defence Imagery and Geospatial Organisation (DIGO)".(Read more about the purpose of the bill in its bills digest.)
According to the explanatory memorandum, this bill addresses the concerns highlighted in the inaugural National Security Statement in 2008. That statement identified the need for national security agencies to form a closer relationship through information sharing in order to address contemporary security issues. This need was further highlighted by the failed terrorist attack on Northwest Airlines Flight 253 on 25 December 2009.
Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate
Policies this vote counts towards
- Increasing surveillance powersSupporters vote No
Votes by party
Votes by party as a table
| Party | Aye | No |
|---|---|---|
| Australian Labor Party | 0 | 23 |
| Liberal Party | 0 | 7 |
| Australian Greens | 5 | 0 |
| Deputy Senate President | 0 | 1 |
| Family First Party | 0 | 1 |
| National Party | 0 | 1 |
How each member voted
Aye · 5
- Bob BrownTasmania · Greens
- Sarah Hanson-YoungSA · Greens
- Scott LudlamWA · Greens
- Christine MilneTasmania · Greens
- Rachel SiewertWA · Greens
No · 33
- Catryna BilykTasmania · Labor
- Mark BishopWA · Labor
- Carol BrownTasmania · Labor
- Doug CameronNSW · Labor
- Trish CrossinNT · Labor
- Don FarrellSA · Labor
- John FaulknerNSW · Labor
- David FeeneyVictoria · Labor
- Michael ForshawNSW · Labor
- Annette HurleySA · Labor
- Steve HutchinsNSW · Labor
- Kate LundyACT · Labor
- Gavin MarshallVictoria · Labor
- Anne McEwenSA · Labor
- Jan McLucasQueensland · Labor
- Claire MooreQueensland · Labor
- Kerry O'BrienTasmania · Labor
- Helen PolleyTasmania · Labor
- Louise PrattWA · Labor
- Nick SherryTasmania · Labor
- Ursula StephensNSW · Labor
- Glenn SterleWA · Labor
- Dana WortleySA · Labor
- Stephen ParryTasmania · Deputy Senate President
- Steve FieldingVictoria · Family First
- Simon BirminghamSA · Liberal
- George BrandisQueensland · Liberal
- David BushbyTasmania · Liberal
- Concetta Fierravanti-WellsNSW · Liberal
- Mitch FifieldVictoria · Liberal
Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.