Skip to content
Political Tracker

15 Sept 2011 · Division 1

National Broadband Network Financial Transparency Bill 2010 (No. 2) — Second Reading — Read a second time

Official title
National Broadband Network Financial Transparency Bill 2010 (No. 2) — Second Reading — Read a second time

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
29
No
36
Not recorded voting
10

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against a motion to read the bill for a second time. This means that the majority rejected the main idea of the bill and that it will not be considered any further.(Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through to become law here. )

Background to the bill

The bill was introduced as a private member's bill by Liberal Senator Simon Birmingham and relates to the National Broadband Network ('NBN'), which is a key Labor Government initiative.(Read more about the NBN on Wikipedia here. ) Its purpose is to require the NBN Co to prepare a business case for the NBN and publish it by 19 November 2010. It also requires the Productivity Commission to prepare a cost-benefit analysis and publish it by 31 May 2011.(Read more about the bill here.)

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
29
No
36
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party025
Liberal Party230
Australian Greens09
National Party40
Country Liberal Party10
Deputy Senate President10
Independent01
Senate President01

How each member voted

Aye · 29

No · 36

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.