Skip to content
Political Tracker

9 Nov 2011 · Division 8

Great Barrier Reef

Official title
Motions - Great Barrier Reef - Suspend applications and approvals until after UNESCO assessment

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
9
No
39
Not recorded voting
28

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against a motion introduced by Greens Senator Larissa Waters.

This means that the motion was not successful.

The motion was:

_That the Senate calls for all applications and approvals made under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 which would have a significant impact on the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area to be suspended until the conclusion of the United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization requested strategic assessment, to allow consideration of all cumulative impacts of coal and coal seam gas ports and other developments on this internationally significant biodiversity icon._(Read more about the status of the Great Barrier Reef on UNESCO.)

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
9
No
39
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party021
Liberal Party012
Australian Greens90
National Party04
Deputy Senate President01
Democratic Labor Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 9

No · 39

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.