Skip to content
Political Tracker

9 May 2012 · 4:02 PM · Division 3

Murray-Darling Basin

Average annual inflows
Official title
Motions - Murray-Darling Basin - Average annual inflows

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
30
No
33
Not recorded voting
13

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against this motion, which means it failed. It was introduced by National Party Leader Barnaby Joyce.

Motion text

That the Senate—

(a) notes that:

(i) the Murray-Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) has modelled the average annual inflows into the Murray Darling Basin (MDB) at 31 599 gigalitres,

(ii) the modelling of these inflows covers a 114 year period from 1895 to 2009,

(iii) the MDBA has not used the past 2 years of data on inflows in calculating the average inflows into the MDB as listed in the draft basin plan,

(iv) the past 2 years have seen record rainfall in the Murray Darling,

(v) the MDBA has acknowledged that including the 2010-12 river inflow data would change inflow calculations by 0.13 per cent or 32 gigalitres of water, and

(vi) the MDBA has stated that 'long term average inflows do not simply translate into estimates of sustainable diversion limits';

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
30
No
33
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party024
Liberal Party230
Australian Greens09
National Party40
Deputy Senate President10
Democratic Labor Party10
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party10

How each member voted

Aye · 30

No · 33

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.