Skip to content
Political Tracker

10 Aug 2006 · 12:46 PM · Division 10

Migration Amendment (Designated Unauthorised Arrivals) Bill 2006

Second Reading - Read a second time
Official title
Migration Amendment (Designated Unauthorised Arrivals) Bill 2006 - Second Reading - Read a second time

Second reading agreed to

Aye
76
No
60
Not recorded voting
14

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding. 3 voted differently from most of their party.

What was decided

The majority voted in favour of a motion to read the bill for a second time.(Read more about the stages that a bill must pass through here. )

This means that the majority agree with the main idea of the bill.

Three Liberal Party ministers rebelled and crossed the floor to vote 'no' with the opposition in this division:(Read more about what it means to cross the floor in our FAQ section. ) Russell Broadbent, Petro Georgiou and Judi Moylan.

Background to the bill

The bill was introduced to expand the offshore processing regime(Read more about Australia's offshore processing regime here. ) to include all people arriving at mainland Australia unlawfully by sea on or after 13 April 2006.(Read more about the bill, including its explanatory memoranda, here. For more background, read its bills digest (293 KB).) This means that all such people will be treated as if they had landed in an excised place, meaning an place that is excluded from the migration zone.

References

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
78
No
62
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Liberal Party663
Australian Labor Party055
National Party90
Independent03
CWM11
Country Liberal Party10
Katter's Australian Party10

How each member voted

Aye · 78

No · 62

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.