Skip to content
Political Tracker

19 Sept 2012 · 12:26 PM · Division 1

Marriage Amendment Bill 2012

Second Reading - Read a second time
Official title
Marriage Amendment Bill 2012 - Second Reading - Read a second time

Second reading defeated

Aye
42
No
98
Not recorded voting
10

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against a motion to read the Marriage Amendment Bill 2012 for a second time. This means that the majority of members reject the main idea of the bill, which was to recognise same-sex marriages.

This means that the bill will not considered any further.

Debate in Parliament

The bill was introduced by Labor Party MP Stephen Jones as a private member’s bill.

Jones MP said that he was guided by the fact that “a majority of Australians are in favour of the changes contained within this bill” as well as “the human right not to be discriminated against on the grounds of sexuality”.(Read Jones MP's contribution here. ) He explained that in 2011 the Australian Labour Party changed its policy to allow its members to make a conscience vote on any legislation that legalised same-sex marriage, which is what occurred in this case.(Read Jones MP's explanation here. )

As the Labor Party called for a conscience vote on this issue, Labor members were split for and against the bill with the majority voting in favour.

Although the Liberal Party did not explicitly allow its members a conscience vote, the Liberal Party’s Luke Simpkins MP said that a conscience vote was “always” an option for Liberal members.(Read Simpkins MP's contribution here. ) However, the Liberal Party still uniformly voted against the bill.

Several members who opposed the bill argued that the current marriage law is not discriminatory. For example, the Liberal Party’s Stuart Robert MP referred to family law expert Professor Patrick Parkinson’s submission to the Senate inquiry into marriage equality that “functional equality has already been achieved” in Australian law for registered same-sex unions.(Read Robert MP's contribution here. )

Background to the Bill

The Marriage Amendment Bill 2012 was introduced into the House of Representatives on the same day as the Marriage Equality Amendment Bill 2012, which was co-sponsored by the Greens Party MP Adam Bandt and Independent MP Andrew Wilkie. There was also a similar bill being considered in the Senate, called the Marriage Equality Amendment Bill 2010, which had been introduced by Greens Party Senator Sarah Hanson-Young. Despite containing different language and writing styles, all three bills aimed to allow people to marry regardless of sex.(Read more about these three bills in the bills digest.)

References

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
42
No
98
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party3926
Liberal Party057
National Party012
Independent21
Australian Greens10
Country Liberal Party01
Katter's Australian Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 42

No · 98

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.