Skip to content
Political Tracker

8 Feb 2006 · 12:08 PM · Division 1

Defence Legislation Amendment (Aid to Civilian Authorities) Bill 2005 [2006] — In Committee

Protest
Official title
Defence Legislation Amendment (Aid to Civilian Authorities) Bill 2005 [2006] — In Committee - Protest

Ayes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
53
No
7
Not recorded voting
16

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted to keep certain items (schedule 2, item 5 and schedule 3, item 3) in the bill unchanged.

This vote happened after Greens Senator Bob Brown moved the following:

(1) Schedule 2, item 5, page 26 (lines 11 to 25), TO BE OPPOSED.

(2) Schedule 3, item 3, page 31 (line 30) to page 32 (line 13), TO BE OPPOSED.

This means that Senator Brown wanted the Senate to reject these items. However, he was unsuccessful and the items remained unchanged.

What were the items that Senator Brown opposed?

Senator Brown explained that he opposed the two items because they would mean that:

... the Chief of the Defence Force, acting on the direction of the Prime Minister, can intervene on a protest by Australians where he or she thinks there is a reasonable chance of serious damage to property. In other words, the Prime Minister can have the Chief of the Defence Force send troops into action against Australians who are protesting on any account.

Text of Schedule 2, item 5:

Insert:

(2A) Despite subsection (1), in exercising powers under Division 2A, a member of the Defence Force must not, in using force against a person:

(a) do anything that is likely to cause the death of, or grievous bodily harm to, the person unless the member believes on reasonable grounds that doing that thing is necessary to:

(i) protect the life of, or to prevent serious injury to, another person (including the member); or

(ii) protect, against the threat concerned, the designated critical infrastructure in respect of which the powers are being exercised; or

(b) subject the person to greater indignity than is reasonable and necessary in the circumstances.

Text of Schedule 3, item 3:

Insert:

(2B) Despite subsection (1), in exercising powers under subparagraph 51SE(1)(a)(i) or (ii) or Division 3B, a member of the Defence Force must not, in using force against a person or thing, do anything that is likely to cause the death of, or grievous bodily harm to, the person unless the member believes on reasonable grounds that:

(a) doing that thing is necessary to protect the life of, or to prevent serious injury to, another person (including the member); or

(b) doing that thing is necessary to protect designated critical infrastructure against a threat of damage or disruption to its operation; or

(c) doing that thing is necessary and reasonable to give effect to the order under which, or under the authority of which, the member is acting.

Learn more about the bill

See the bills digest for more information about the bill.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
54
No
8
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party230
Liberal Party230
Australian Democrats04
Australian Greens04
National Party30
Country Liberal Party10
Deputy Senate President10
Family First Party10
Senate President10
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party10

How each member voted

Aye · 54

No · 8

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.