Skip to content
Political Tracker

13 Nov 2013 · 4:08 PM · Division 2

Great Barrier Reef

Reject the Abbot Point coal port expansion proposal
Official title
Motions - Great Barrier Reef - Reject the Abbot Point coal port expansion proposal

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
9
No
47
Not recorded voting
19

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against a motion introduced by Greens Senator Larissa Waters, which is:

That the Senate-

(a) notes:

_(i) the concern shared by Great Barrier Reef dive operators, charter boat companies, tourism operators, scientists and the community at large, and the World Heritage Committee, about the destructive dredging and offshore dumping for the proposed Abbot Point coal port expansion, planned to be the largest coal port in the world, and_

(ii) the withdrawal of BHP Billiton from the proposed T2 terminal at Abbot Point, citing lack of need for additional port capacity; and(Read more about their withdrawal on ABC News here.)

(b) calls on the Government to listen to the community and our scientific experts and reject the Abbot Point dredging and dumping application and save the reef's waters, our coral reefs, fishing grounds and seagrass meadows from another 3 million tonnes of smothering dredge spoil.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
9
No
47
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party025
Liberal Party016
Australian Greens90
National Party03
Deputy Senate President01
Democratic Labor Party01
Senate President01

How each member voted

Aye · 9

No · 47

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.