Skip to content
Political Tracker

30 Sept 2014 · 5:13 PM · Division 3

Certain Aspects of Queensland Government Administration

End debate on whether to include Bligh Government in inquiry
Official title
Committees - Certain Aspects of Queensland Government Administration - End debate on whether to include Bligh Government in inquiry

Ayes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
32
No
29
Not recorded voting
15

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority wanted to end debate on the question of whether the select committee's inquiry should include the former Bligh Government (that is, that the period of inquiry should begin on 21 March 2009 rather than 26 March 2012). This means that the question will now be asked immediately without further discussion (see that division). In parliamentary jargon, they voted for putting the question.

###What will the committee do?

The select committee will inquire into and report on:

But! Because of Australia's federal system of government, the committee can only look into these things if they in some way relate to the Commonwealth.

Palmer United Party Senator Glenn Lazarus explained that he believed the committee was necessary because "serious issues have been raised across the community regarding Queensland government appointments, judicial appointments, project approvals, use of funds, policies and practices, environmental degradation and various other matters" (see his full explanation).

###Background to the motion

This is the second time that Palmer United Party Senator Glenn Lazarus has introduced this motion. The first time failed because Liberal Senator Eric Abetz managed to amend the motion so the period of inquiry would begin from 21 March 2009 and therefore include former Labor Premier Anna Bligh's government.

Following that successful amendment, the motion lost the Labor Party's support and so was voted down without a division (see ABC News).

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
32
No
28
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Liberal Party020
Australian Labor Party170
Australian Greens100
Liberal National Party02
National Party02
Palmer United Party20
Australian Motoring Enthusiast Party10
Deputy Senate President01
Democratic Labor Party01
Family First Party01
Jacqui Lambie Network10
Liberal Democratic Party01
Senate President10

How each member voted

Aye · 32

No · 28

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.