Skip to content
Political Tracker

23 Aug 2012 · 12:08 PM · Division 2

Inequality

Introduce a Federal Equality Act
Official title
Motions - Inequality - Introduce a Federal Equality Act

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
9
No
39
Not recorded voting
27

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against introducing "a stand-alone Federal Equality Act", which was suggested by Greens Senator Penny Wright.

Wording of the motion

That the Senate—

(a) recognises that discrimination and inequality are alive and well in Australia, for example, in August 2010, women earned 16.9 per cent less than men on average per week, with the total earnings gap increasing to 34.8 per cent per week when taking into account part time and casual work; and

(b) calls on the Government to:

(i) seize the opportunity to introduce a stand-alone Federal Equality Act that adopts global best-practice standards and brings Australian law into line with our international human rights obligations, and

(ii) ensure that new equality legislation includes, among other things, a specific duty to promote equality and eliminate discrimination, prohibits discrimination in all areas of public life and removes arbitrary and blanket exemptions.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
9
No
39
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party021
Liberal Party011
Australian Greens90
National Party02
Country Liberal Party01
Deputy Senate President01
Democratic Labor Party01
Independent01
Senate President01

How each member voted

Aye · 9

No · 39

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.