Skip to content
Political Tracker

26 Nov 2014 · Division 1

Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2014

Official title
Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2014 - in Committee - Control orders only if support/facilitation already provided

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
11
No
34
Not recorded voting
31

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority disagreed with Greens Senator Penny Wright's amendments to the proposed paragraphs that relate to issuing and varying control orders.

The amendments

The three amendments would have replaced sections that allow control orders to be issued or varied in order to prevent a person from providing support for or facilitating a terrorist act. Instead, the amendments would have required that the person has provided support for or otherwise facilitated such acts.

In other words, the bill currently allows for an interim control order to be issued or varied before any support or facilitation has occurred, whereas the amendment would have required that that support or facilitation has already been provided.

Expand control order regime

The expansion of the control order regime that is proposed in this bill is described in the bills digest as "significant and warrant[ing] close scrutiny".

The greatest concern is the lack of clarity relating to what constitutes ‘support’ for or ‘facilitation’ of a terrorist act or engagement in hostile activities in a foreign country, because the two terms are undefined (see bills digest).

Background to the bill

This bill is the third that has been introduced since mid-2014. A number of incidents have happened before and during the course of the introduction of these bills.

There was one of the biggest counter-terrorism operations in Australian history. The Prime Minister Tony Abbott also confirmed that Australia would be sending the military to Iraq to fight the Islamic State (IS) (also known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) or the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL)).

The scope of this bill is narrower than the earlier two but, as mentioned above, some of its measures are "significant and warrant close scrutiny" (see bills digest). In particular, the proposed expansion of the control order regime (see above) and measures that would allow the heads of Australian Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS), Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) and Australian Geospatial-Intelligence Organisation (AGO) to authorise activities in place of ministers in emergency circumstances.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
11
No
34
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party015
Australian Greens100
Liberal Party010
National Party04
Palmer United Party02
Australian Motoring Enthusiast Party01
Family First Party01
Liberal Democratic Party10
Liberal National Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 11

No · 34

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.