Skip to content
Political Tracker

3 Dec 2014 · 4:07 PM · Division 4

PricewaterhouseCoopers Data Retention Legislation Report – Order for the Production of Documents

Official title
Documents – PricewaterhouseCoopers Data Retention Legislation Report – Order for the Production of Documents

Ayes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
38
No
30
Not recorded voting
8

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The Senate voted in support of Senator Scott Ludlam’s motion:

That the Senate—

(a) notes that:

  • (ii) the Government has not detailed the cost of its data retention legislation; and

(b) orders that there be laid on the table by the Attorney-General, no later than noon on Thursday, 4 December 2014:

  • (i) the summarised findings of the PricewaterhouseCoopers study or a copy of the study with commercially sensitive information redacted; and
  • (ii) a timeline for the Government's process for developing cost estimates for its data retention policy.

Division 24th Nov 2014, 4:44 PM – Senate Documents — Telecommunications; Order for the Production of Documents is potentially related.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
38
No
30
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Liberal Party022
Australian Labor Party210
Australian Greens90
National Party04
Liberal National Party02
Palmer United Party20
Australian Motoring Enthusiast Party10
Deputy Senate President01
Democratic Labor Party10
Family First Party01
Independent10
Jacqui Lambie Network10
Liberal Democratic Party10
Senate President10

How each member voted

Aye · 38

No · 30

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.