4 Dec 2014 · Division 1
Migration and Maritime Powers Legislation Amendment (Resolving the Asylum Legacy Caseload) Bill 2014
A vote on changing the text of a bill or motion, not on passing it.
- Official title
- Migration and Maritime Powers Legislation Amendment (Resolving the Asylum Legacy Caseload) Bill 2014 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with Senate's amendments
Ayes in the majority
This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.
- Aye
- 76
- No
- 39
- Not recorded voting
- 35
“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.
What was decided
The majority agreed with the amendments made to the bill in the Senate. This means that the bill can now become law because it has been passed by both houses of Parliament in the same form.
Bill's main idea
The bill's main idea is to speed up the management of asylum seekers' claims and support the Government's policies that stop asylum seekers from coming to Australia by boat (for example, by intercepting the boats and turning them around). It also re-introduces temporary protection visas "because the Government is of the view that those who arrive by boat without a valid visa should not be rewarded with permanent protection" (see the bills digest)
Human rights issues
Some of the changes made by the bill may go against Australia's international law obligations. Particularly Australia's non-refoulement obligations, which stop Australia from sending people to places where their lives or freedoms are threatened. Australia has these obligations because it signed up to the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the United Nations Convention against Torture.
For example, the bill will insert a provision into the Migration Act 1958 that says that Australia’s non-refoulement obligations are not relevant to removing people who are not citizens and don't have a visa. The bills digest explains that this change would mean courts won't be able to stop the Government from removing people just because it is against Australia’s non-refoulement obligations. In other words, the Government wants to decide how to apply those obligations by itself, without any potential judicial oversight.
For more about which changes may go against these obligations and how, see the bills digest.
Background to the bill
The title of the bill says it is about "resolving the asylum legacy caseload". This refers to the asylum claims made by asylum seekers who arrived by boat without a visa between August 2012 and December 2013 and who have not been sent to be processed on Nauru or Manus Island. The Coalition Government says this caseload of asylum claims is the result of the previous Labor Government's policies.
During the 2013 election campaign, the Coalition said it would address this caseload and the changes made in this bill are part of their effort to do this.
More information on the background to the bill is in the bills digest.
Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate
Policies this vote counts towards
- Implementing refugee and protection conventionsSupporters vote No · counts strongly
- Increasing scrutiny of asylum seeker managementSupporters vote No · counts strongly
- Regional processing of asylum seekersSupporters vote Aye
- Temporary protection visasSupporters vote Aye · counts strongly
Votes by party
Votes by party as a table
| Party | Aye | No |
|---|---|---|
| Liberal Party | 63 | 0 |
| Australian Labor Party | 0 | 38 |
| National Party | 12 | 0 |
| Country Liberal Party | 1 | 0 |
| Independent | 0 | 1 |
How each member voted
Aye · 76
- Natasha GriggsSolomon · CLP
- Tony AbbottWarringah · Liberal
- Kevin AndrewsMenzies · Liberal
- Karen AndrewsMcPherson · Liberal
- Bob BaldwinPaterson · Liberal
- Bruce BillsonDunkley · Liberal
- Julie BishopCurtin · Liberal
- Jamie BriggsMayo · Liberal
- Russell BroadbentMonash · Liberal
- Mal BroughFisher · Liberal
- Scott BuchholzWright · Liberal
- Steven CioboMoncrieff · Liberal
- Peter DuttonDickson · Liberal
- Paul FletcherBradfield · Liberal
- Teresa GambaroBrisbane · Liberal
- Ian GoodenoughMoore · Liberal
- Alex HawkeMitchell · Liberal
- Sarah HendersonVictoria · Liberal
- Peter HendyEden-Monaro · Liberal
- Luke HowarthPetrie · Liberal
- Greg HuntFlinders · Liberal
- Eric HutchinsonLyons · Liberal
- Steve IronsSwan · Liberal
- Dennis JensenTangney · Liberal
- Ewen JonesHerbert · Liberal
- Michael KeenanStirling · Liberal
- Craig KellyHughes · Liberal
- Andrew LamingBowman · Liberal
- Craig LaundyReid · Liberal
- Sussan LeyFarrer · Liberal
No · 39
- Sharon BirdCunningham · Labor
- Chris BowenMcMahon · Labor
- Gai BrodtmannCanberra · Labor
- Tony BurkeWatson · Labor
- Mark ButlerHindmarsh · Labor
- Terri ButlerGriffith · Labor
- Anthony ByrneHolt · Labor
- Jim ChalmersRankin · Labor
- Lisa ChestersBendigo · Labor
- Sharon ClaydonNewcastle · Labor
- Michael DanbyMelbourne Ports · Labor
- Mark DreyfusIsaacs · Labor
- Justine ElliotRichmond · Labor
- David FeeneyVictoria · Labor
- Laurie FergusonReid · Labor
- Joel FitzgibbonHunter · Labor
- Andrew GilesScullin · Labor
- Jill HallShortland · Labor
- Chris HayesWerriwa · Labor
- Ed HusicChifley · Labor
- Stephen JonesWhitlam · Labor
- Jenny MacklinJagajaga · Labor
- Richard MarlesCorio · Labor
- Rob MitchellMcEwen · Labor
- Shayne NeumannBlair · Labor
- Clare O'NeilHotham · Labor
- Julie OwensParramatta · Labor
- Melissa ParkeFremantle · Labor
- Tanya PlibersekSydney · Labor
- Bernie RipollOxley · Labor
Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.