Skip to content
Political Tracker

24 Feb 2016 · 4:20 PM · Division 2

Alcohol-Fuelled Violence

Official title
Motions — Alcohol-Fuelled Violence

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
14
No
38
Not recorded voting
24

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against Greens senator Lee Rhiannon's motion which would have asked the Federal Government to ask the New South Wales Government to reconsider their lockout laws.

The main parts of the Sydney lockout laws, introduced by the Liberal Baird government, mean that certain venues can't sell takeaway alcohol after 10:00pm, accept new customers after 1:30am or serve alcohol after 3:00am.

Three days before Rhiannon introduced the motion, 15000 people protested against the lockout laws in Sydney.

Wording of the motion

That the Senate—

(a) notes that:

(i) on 3 February 2016, the Senate referred the ‘need for a nationally-consistent approach to alcohol-fuelled violence’ to the Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee,

(ii) late night violence and alcohol abuse has terrible consequences and is putting health and law enforcement services under tremendous pressure,

(iii) other large cities have retained a vibrant night life by providing 24 hour public transport, a range of support services and policing, and diversity in the density of licensed premises,

(iv) since the Sydney CBD entertainment precinct’s lockout laws commenced there have been huge costs to creative communities, live performances have declined by 40 per cent, jobs have been lost and dozens of venues have closed,

(v) on Sunday, 21 February 2016, about 15 000 people protesting in Sydney against the lockout policy of the New South Wales Liberal/National Government singled out job losses, the lack of personal freedoms and lost opportunities for young people as key concerns, and

(vi) residents and visitors to Sydney’s entertainment precinct should not be punished due to the behaviour of a small minority, and local communities should have a right to choose whether or not to have state lockout laws imposed on their localities; and

(b) calls on the Federal Government to urge the New South Wales Government to work with the community and key stakeholders to find innovative and integrated long-term solutions that will keep Sydney vibrant, open and safe.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
14
No
38
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party017
Liberal Party015
Australian Greens100
National Party03
Palmer United Party11
Australian Motoring Enthusiast Party10
Deputy Senate President01
Democratic Labor Party10
Liberal Democratic Party10
Senate President01

How each member voted

Aye · 14

No · 38

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.