Skip to content
Political Tracker

1 Dec 2016 · 1:40 PM · Division 5

Criminal Code Amendment (War Crimes) Bill 2016

Second Reading - More scrutiny
Official title
Criminal Code Amendment (War Crimes) Bill 2016 - Second Reading - More scrutiny

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
8
No
39
Not recorded voting
28

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against a motion to add certain words (see below) to the original motion to read the bill for a second time (which is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill).

This means that the majority of senators rejected this motion, which was introduced by Tasmanian Greens Senator Nick McKim.

Motion text

At the end of the motion, add:

", but the Senate notes, in the context of these proposed amendments, the Australian Defence Force's participation in military operations involving drones or autonomous weapons is currently surrounded in secrecy and calls on the Government, where these operations result in civilian casualties, to publish a monthly report detailing the date, location, target, number of civilian casualties and level of Australian assistance to these operations.".

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
8
No
39
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Liberal Party016
Australian Labor Party015
Australian Greens80
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party03
National Party02
Derryn Hinch's Justice Party01
Jacqui Lambie Network01
Liberal National Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 8

No · 39

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.