Skip to content
Political Tracker

8 Feb 2017 · 5:11 PM · Division 3

Interactive Gambling Amendment Bill 2016

Official title
Interactive Gambling Amendment Bill 2016 - Second Reading - Phase out ads relating to betting or gambling

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
72
No
76
Not recorded voting
2

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against a motion, which means it was unsuccessful.

It was introduced by Labor MP Julie Collins (Franklin)

Motion text

That all the words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:

"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House calls on the Government to work with the broadcasting industry and national sporting organisations on a transition plan to phase out the promotion of betting odds and commercials relating to betting or gambling before and during live sporting broadcasts, with a view to their prohibition".

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
72
No
74
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party660
Liberal Party056
National Party014
Independent22
Australian Greens10
Centre Alliance10
Katter's Australian Party10
Liberal National Party01
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party01
Speaker10

How each member voted

Aye · 72

No · 74

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.