Skip to content
Political Tracker

19 June 2017 · 3:53 PM · Division 5

Mining

Adani's Carmichael mine
Official title
Motions - Mining - Adani's Carmichael mine

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
12
No
44
Not recorded voting
20

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against a motion that, among other things, called for a review of Adani's approvals for the Carmichael mine under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. It also wanted to strengthen the environmental history test under that Act, which lets the Minister consider the proponent's environmental history when deciding to grant approval (in this case, the proponent would be Adani, which has had a chequered environmental history).

Motion text

That the Senate call on the Federal Government to:

(a) Add a 'suitable person' test on Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility;

(b) strengthen the environmental history test under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999; and

(c) review Adani’s approvals for the Carmichael mine under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
12
No
44
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Liberal Party016
Australian Labor Party015
Australian Greens90
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party04
National Party03
Independent11
Liberal National Party02
Nick Xenophon Team20
Country Liberal Party01
Derryn Hinch's Justice Party01
Liberal Democratic Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 12

No · 44

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.