Skip to content
Political Tracker

15 Aug 2018 · 6:44 PM · Division 7

Coastal Trading (Revitalising Australian Shipping) Amendment Bill 2017

Consideration in Detail - Agree with bill
Official title
Coastal Trading (Revitalising Australian Shipping) Amendment Bill 2017 - Consideration in Detail - Agree with bill

Ayes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
78
No
67
Not recorded voting
5

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted in favour of a motion to agree with the bill in its current form. This means they can now consider whether or not they wish to pass the bill in the House.

What does this bill do?

According to the bills digest:

The purpose of the Coastal Trading (Revitalising Australian Shipping) Amendment Bill 2017 (the Bill) is to amend the Coastal Trading (Revitalising Australian Shipping) Act 2012 (the Coastal Trading Act) to streamline the regulation of coastal trading, including by:

  • removing the five-voyage minimum requirement for temporary licences
  • simplifying licence variation, consultation and notification processes
  • amending the tolerance provisions for temporary licence voyages
  • abolishing the separate category of emergency licences and
  • extending the regime to cover, for example, voyages involving offshore petroleum facilities.

Fadden MP Stuart Robert explained why the bill was introduced:

The Coastal Trading (Revitalising Australian Shipping) Act was introduced in 2012 as part of a suite reforms designed to provide the Australian shipping industry with a stable framework and indeed to encourage further investment. Unfortunately that has not been the case. Since implementation of the current framework, the decline in the number of Australian flagged vessels has unfortunately continued. The reality at the moment is that many ageing Australian registered vessels are not being replaced. The sector is ostensibly in decline. This bill was intended to balance the interests of the Australian shipping industry and users of shipping services by regulating Australian and foreign flagged ships through a licensing system. Unfortunately this simply hasn't happened. Australian businesses have faced such significant issues accessing coastal shipping that they've given up and frankly started sending their products by road or rail. Something has to change.

Opposition to the bill

Shortland MP Pat Conroy (Labor) explained his party's opposition to the bill:

This bill offers a raft of measures that will make it easier for foreign flagged vessels to operate in Australian waters, while providing absolutely nothing for Australian flagged vessels. The proposal before the House would increase tolerance limits from their current level of plus or minus 20 per cent of the nominated cargo or passenger volumes to 200 per cent more or 100 per cent less. It would also change the current loading window from plus or minus five days to 30 days either side of the authorised date. This drastic increase of volume tolerance limits and loading windows would make it impossible for Australian owned and operated ships that hold general licences to compete with foreign vessels holding temporary licences. These provisions would, according to the Maritime Union of Australia, totally undermine accepted commercial arrangements and make it impossible for a general licence holder to contest a cargo, as a general licence holder would not know what they were contesting.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
76
No
67
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party064
Liberal Party560
National Party140
Independent31
Australian Greens01
Centre Alliance10
Liberal National Party10
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party10
Speaker01

How each member voted

Aye · 76

No · 67

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.