Skip to content
Political Tracker

18 Sept 2018 · 4:45 PM · Division 3

Whaling

Patrol against + investigate legal options
Official title
Motions - Whaling - Patrol against + investigate legal options

Ayes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
32
No
27
Not recorded voting
17

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted in favour of a motion introduced by Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young (SA), which means it succeeded. Motions like these don't make any legal changes on their own, but are politically influential as they represent the will of the Senate.

Motion text

That the Senate:

(a) notes that the International Whaling Commission (IWC) has rejected Japan's bid to overturn a long-standing ban on commercial whaling;

(b) notes further that Japan has threatened to withdraw from the IWC and indicated its intention to continue hunting for 'scientific' purposes; and

(c) calls on the government to:

(i) commit to sending a vessel to patrol the Southern Ocean this summer, and

(ii) investigate Australia's legal options under international law.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
32
No
27
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Liberal Party019
Australian Labor Party180
Australian Greens90
Independent12
National Party02
Nick Xenophon Team20
Country Liberal Party01
Derryn Hinch's Justice Party10
Liberal Democratic Party01
Liberal National Party01
Senate President10
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 32

No · 27

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.