Skip to content
Political Tracker

27 Nov 2018 · 12:13 PM · Division 1

Defence Amendment (Call Out of the Australian Defence Force) Bill 2018

Second Reading - Make disallowable instruments
Official title
Defence Amendment (Call Out of the Australian Defence Force) Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Make disallowable instruments

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
11
No
35
Not recorded voting
30

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against a second reading amendment moved by Tasmanian Senator Nick McKim (Greens). The amendment would have added the words below to the usual second reading motion, which was that they agree with the main idea of the bill. Or, in parliamentary jargon, that they "read the bill for a second time".

Motion text

At the end of the motion, add "but the Senate is of the opinion that:

(a) call out orders should be disallowable instruments so that they are subject to scrutiny by the Parliament; and

(b) the Parliament should sit within six days of any call out order being made".

What does the bill do?

The bill was introduced to clarify how the Australian Defence Force (ADF) can be called out to protect Commonwealth interests and states and self-governing territories from domestic violence. It was introduced following a Defence review after the Lindt café siege in Sydney.

It makes the following changes to:

  • permit states and territories to request that the Commonwealth call out the Australian Defence Force (ADF) in a wider range of circumstances;
  • enable call out orders to authorise the ADF to operate in multiple jurisdictions, as well as the offshore area;
  • authorise the ADF to respond to incidents that cross a border into a jurisdiction that has not been specified in an order in certain circumstances;
  • allow the ADF to be pre-authorised to respond to land and maritime threats, in addition to aviation threats;
  • increase the requirements for the ADF to consult with state and territory police where it is operating in their jurisdictions;
  • simplify, expand and clarify the power of the ADF to search and seize, and to control movement during an incident;
  • remove the distinction between general security areas and designated areas; and
  • for the purposes of expedited call out, clarify that acting ministers are to be treated as substantive ministers and add the Minister for Home Affairs as an alternative authorising minister.

Read more in the bills digest.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
11
No
35
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party014
Liberal Party011
Australian Greens90
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party04
National Party02
Nick Xenophon Team20
Deputy Senate President01
Derryn Hinch's Justice Party01
Liberal National Party01
Senate President01

How each member voted

Aye · 11

No · 35

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.