Skip to content
Political Tracker

4 Dec 2018 · 4:37 PM · Division 6

Australian Research Council

Remove National Interest Test
Official title
Motions - Australian Research Council - Remove National Interest Test

Ayes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
31
No
29
Not recorded voting
16

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted in favour of a motion, which means it succeeded. Motions like these don't make any legal changes on their own but do represent the will of the Senate and so can be politically influential.

Motion text

That the Senate:

(a) notes that:

(i) the new National Interest Test for the Australian Research Council research grants will allow the Government of the day to influence an independent research approval process,

(ii) narrow political agendas should not be allowed to determine long-term research priorities, and

(iii) the Australian Research Council already has a rigorous peer review process for assessing grant applications and applicants are required to demonstrate the benefits and impact of their research; and

(b) calls on the Federal Government to remove the National Interest Test from research grants administered by the Australian Research Council.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
31
No
29
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party180
Liberal Party016
Australian Greens90
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party04
National Party03
Independent11
Liberal National Party02
Nick Xenophon Team20
Country Liberal Party01
Deputy Senate President01
Derryn Hinch's Justice Party10
Liberal Democratic Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 31

No · 29

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.