Skip to content
Political Tracker

24 July 2019 · 10:38 AM · Division 3

Future Drought Fund Bill 2019 and another

Second Reading - Fossil fuel companies water use
Official title
Future Drought Fund Bill 2019 and another - Second Reading - Fossil fuel companies water use

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
10
No
54
Not recorded voting
12

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against a motion introduced by Queensland Senator Larissa Waters (Greens), which means it failed. The motion would have amended the usual second reading motion, which is that "the bills be read for a second time". This is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill.

Motion text

At the end of the motion, add:

", but the Senate notes that free or unlimited water entitlements given to fossil fuel companies by State and Territory governments, while farmers struggle with drought conditions, significantly undermines the effectiveness of any drought response by:

(a) depriving farmers of water;

(b) exacerbating droughts; and

(c) worsening climate change which further exacerbates droughts."

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
10
No
54
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Liberal Party026
Australian Labor Party018
Australian Greens90
National Party03
Nick Xenophon Team02
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party02
Country Liberal Party01
Deputy Senate President01
Jacqui Lambie Network10
Liberal National Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 10

No · 54

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.