Skip to content
Political Tracker

25 Feb 2020 · 5:25 PM · Division 1

Paid Parental Leave Amendment (Flexibility Measures) Bill 2020

Second Reading - Criticism of welfare cuts
Official title
Paid Parental Leave Amendment (Flexibility Measures) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Criticism of welfare cuts

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
68
No
79
Not recorded voting
4

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against an amendment introduced by member for Barton Linda Burney to the usual second reading motion that "the bill be read for a second time", which is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill.

Motion text

That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:

"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House notes:

(1) the financial difficulties facing Australian parents juggling young children and work;

(2) the Government's repeated cuts to family assistance and programs designed to support children and parents; and

(3) that women continue to do a disproportionable share of work in the home and raising children, as well as facing a significant gender pay gap"

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
68
No
78
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party650
Liberal Party053
National Party014
Liberal National Party05
Independent13
Australian Greens10
Centre Alliance01
Katter's Australian Party01
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party01
Speaker10

How each member voted

Aye · 68

No · 78

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.