Skip to content
Political Tracker

8 Apr 2020 · 3:46 PM · Division 9

Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Bill 2020 and related bills

Second Reading - Eligibility of JobKeeper payment
Official title
Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Bill 2020 and related bills - Second Reading - Eligibility of JobKeeper payment

Ayes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
30
No
24
Not recorded voting
97

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted in favour of a motion to keep unchanged the usual second reading motion "that the bill be read for a second time" (which is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). This motion was put after Rankin MP Jim Chalmers (Labor) introduced an amendment to change the wording.

MP Chalmers explained the rationale behind his amendment in his contribution to the debate.

Amendment text

That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:

"whilst not declining to give these bills a second reading, the House:

(1) notes that this legislation gives the Treasurer extraordinary powers to include those not currently eligible for the JobKeeper Payment; and

(2) calls on the Treasurer to use his power under this legislation to ensure more jobs are protected and that struggling, otherwise viable businesses and organisations are able to access the JobKeeper Payment".

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
29
No
24
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Liberal Party230
Australian Labor Party021
National Party50
Independent12
Australian Greens01

How each member voted

Aye · 29

No · 24

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.