Skip to content
Political Tracker

8 Apr 2020 · 8:08 PM · Division 2

Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Bill 2020 and related bills

Second Reading - Visa holders
Official title
Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Bill 2020 and related bills - Second Reading - Visa holders

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
13
No
21
Not recorded voting
42

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against an amendment to the usual second reading motion "that the bill be read for a second time" (which is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). This mean that the amendment failed.

This amendment was introduced by NSW Senator Kristina Keneally (Labor) and, if it had been successful, its text would have been added to the usual second reading motion as a note. In other words, it didn't seek to change the actual text of the bills.

Senator Keneally explained the rationale behind her amendment in her contribution to the debate.

Amendment text

At the end of the motion, add:

", but the Senate:

(a) notes that:

(i) during the coronavirus crisis, if someone living in Australia needs support, they should be able to access it,

(ii) the Government has extended the jobkeeper payment to 444 visa holders on the basis that these visa holders have a long connection with their employers,

(iii) many other visa holders have equally long connections with their employers, but their employers will not be able to claim the jobkeeper payment for these employees,

(iv) the package of bills before the Senate will give the Treasurer the power to extend the jobkeeper payment to any visa holder,

(v) this is an important power given the current environment, and one that is supported by the Labor Party,

(vi) the Minister for Families and Social Services has similar powers to expand the jobseeker payment to other categories of people, including various types of visa holders, but the Minister has not exercised these powers in relation to temporary visa holders to date,

(vii) Labor supports the Government's position that if a temporary migrant worker can go home, they should. However, many temporary migrants are now trapped in Australia by border closures and the shutdown of international flights,

(viii) where migrants cannot go home, the Government must ensure temporary visa holders are not getting sick or falling through the cracks, and

(ix) the lack of support for temporary migrants trapped in Australia is a serious public health and economic issue for all Australians; and

(b) calls on the Government to use these powers to provide appropriate support to everyone living in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic."

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
13
No
21
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Liberal Party016
Australian Labor Party80
Australian Greens30
National Party02
Deputy Senate President01
Liberal National Party01
Nick Xenophon Team10
Senate President10
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 13

No · 21

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.