Skip to content
Political Tracker

10 June 2020 · 7:12 PM · Division 1

National Skills Commissioner Bill 2020

Second Reading - Keep second reading motion unchanged
Official title
National Skills Commissioner Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Keep second reading motion unchanged

Ayes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
40
No
28
Not recorded voting
82

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted in favour of keeping unchanged the original second reading motion, which is "that the bill be read for a second time" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill).

The MP for Sydney Tanya Plibersek had proposed to amend this motion with the text below.

Amendment text

That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:

"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House notes that the Government:

(1) has damaged and neglected Australia's vocational education and training system, cutting over $3 billion from TAFE and training;

(2) is presiding over a disastrous decline in apprenticeships and traineeships; and

(3) is failing to work with employers, unions and TAFEs to rebuild Australia's world-class vocational education system".

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
39
No
28
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party026
Liberal Party260
National Party80
Independent21
Liberal National Party20
Australian Greens01
Centre Alliance10

How each member voted

Aye · 39

No · 28

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.